On the contrary. I don’t reject the notion that Jackie preferred Bethesda or that the Kennedy family was tired and perhaps impatient, but I don’t think they would’ve forced him to end the autopsy prematurely. The bulk of the direct-dial long-distance calls came from the curious, the disturbed, the downright demented. Here’s the example you showcase in your book of my misrepresenting testimony, and it’s clear it’s you who are misrepresenting. Since Ruby's death in 1967, areas where Kennedy was pronounced dead and Oswald was operated on have been remodeled. Mr. Kiel, if you need the text of your comment I will email it to you. Exam rooms feature flexible equipment setups, and an on-site conference facility accommodates education and wellness programs. They show certain details (fracture lines and fragments in the brain) better. You and Photon have offered this tepid paragraph countless times, claiming ER doctors cannot distinguish entrance wounds from exit wounds. September 22, 2019 update: Added 2 images showing a man in white shirt with short sleeves handling a cable. “http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/head.htm#aguilar, “Of course, the best evidence is the photos and x-rays are the best evidence. Not a direct quote, but that is the essence of your speech. You blather on and on about your supposed “credentials,” when in fact you have NONE> You criticize Mr. Talbot’s book because he put Allen Dulles in the wrong place. “The most irritating and demanding part of this assignment is maintaining … 500 words or less”.I like the limit. That fact prompted an amusing exchange when ARRB counsel Jeremy Gunn asked Humes, “Do you see any inconsistency at all between destroying some handwritten notes that contained blood on them but preserving other handwritten notes that also had blood on them?” Lamely, Humes answered, “Well, only that the others (that he destroyed) were of my own making. His certificate doesn’t even state the reason for said destruction. “A network television correspondent said, ‘Surely, Arthur, you don’t expect the American press to be the handmaidens of government.’. The most notorious of these second- hand wound descriptions is reflected in McClelland’s written note of Nov. 22, when he regurgitated not what he personally observed, but what Jenkins told him-that JFK had a wound in the left temple. P. 529 – 30: “There was a great laceration on the right side of the head (temporal and occipital), causing a great defect in the skull plate so that there was herniation and laceration of great areas of the brain, even to the extent that the cerebellum had protruded from the wound.” M. T. Jenkins, MD, 11.22.63, 16:30. http://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/warren-commission-report/appendix8.html. But McAdams is correct that I offered Hill as a witness who said JFK’s skull damage was rearward. 8. Cornwell: Did you have any notes or records at that point as to the exact location of the –, “Dr. Perry’s comments therefore immediately led to the question that attorney Mark Lane and others have been asking for nearly thirty years: How could accused assassin Lee Harvey Oswald have shot the President in the throat from behind?…. : https://jfkfacts.org/comment-policy/….8. Thank you Dr. Aguilar for pointing out the inconsistencies in Hume’s testimony*. Question by Mr. Cornwell- I’ll read this into the record. https://www.maryferrell.org/pages/Essay_-_Is_Vincent_Bugliosi_Right_that_Neutron_Activation_Analysis_Proves_Oswalds_Guilt.html. Would you like to know another way “not to do history?” Allow a government agency or agencies chocked full of liars to produce a “report” based on “evidence” that has either been suppressed (please see anything by the CIA) or tampered with (please see anything by the FBI) and hope for the best. Lawrence, I believe Finck waffles or hedges his answers, either to not offend a higher authority or the Kennedy Family, or protect himself. Each of those things would have delayed the completion of the autopsy if done. Lane, in particular, was eager to include film footage of the Parkland news conference in his documentary on the Warren Report. But he won’t; he can’t; no one can. So his testimony cuts both ways. (Such an act, of course, would have been medicolegally frowned upon had it occurred in a civilian autopsy of even the most undistinguished murder victim.) I guess it’s not necessary if you qualify your autopsy conclusions with the adjective “presumably” (cough, cough). A fragment that included the front end of a bullet was found in the front seat area. Burkley was an Admiral, not a general, which is something else McA would prefer you not recall. Both concealed deliberately and disseminated propaganda. Required fields are marked *, In seeking to expand the range of informed debate about the events of 1963 and its aftermath, JFKFacts.org welcomes comments that are factual, engaging, and civil. I don’t want to waste more time answering your irrelevant posts. Lifton, David. So have numerous other doctors, including (early on) Wecht and Lattimer. For example, he told the New York Times that “if that transcript shows in any way I have withdrawn or revised my thoughts of the Warren Report, I’ll eat the . Imagine the conversation at *that* planning session. Which X-ray was Humes looking at McAdams? It was a massive wound, and all of the brain of that part of his head had been blown out. That aside, apparently McAdams considers me massively selective and quite tendentious because I failed to include in my 1994 essay statements that Clint Hill (may have) made to National Geographic in 2004. Do you believe, from what you originally saw at Parkland, in regards to the President’s wounds, that the autopsy photos have been tampered with, or do you think that they are pulling President Kennedy’s scalp up and it’s hiding the wound in the back of his head? … When wearrived in Dallas the President got off ONE END of the plane. Washington, DC, February 29, 2016 – The Gerald Ford White House significantly altered the final report of the supposedly independent 1975 Rockefeller Commission investigating CIA domestic activities, over the objections of senior Commission staff, according to internal White House and Commission documents posted today by the National Security Archive at The George Washington University (www.nsarchive.org). And in his 1965 Blumberg memo, Finck said he was denied JFK’s clothes. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. The failure of the century at Parkland Hospital was that they didn’t have a Poly Sci asst professor on hand when JFK came in to help them understand the President’s injuries. So despite your questions, it seems that you would rather have us all believe that it’s standard practice or not unusual for autopsy pathologists to burn their notes, even for VIPs. I want to know why didn’t you as an autopsy pathologist attempt to ascertain the track through the body which you had on the autopsy table in trying to ascertain the cause or causes of death? Some of the titles were legitimate. Such a dissection would have been a rudimentary procedure in any murder case. Reproduced in: Weisberg, Harold, Post Mortem. I’m sure there were textbooks, like Milton Hepburn’s definitive work,Legal Medicine, Pathology and Toxicology (1954), and other standards of practice that preceded said document. So what does that book have anything to do with my reply? After 50 years, he told his story for the first time to hundreds of emergency medicine doctors and technicians gathered at the Dallas Sheraton hotel for an annual conference. He said he had destroyed the bloodstained autopsy notes so they would never become objects of morbid curiosity the way the doilies on President Lincoln’s chair had become, stained as they were with the blood of John Wilkes Booth’s treason.Alas, Specter’s passion for truth exceeds his passion for fact-checking. FORENSIC AUTOPSY PERFORMANCE STANDARDSThe National Association of Medical Examiners. Core seem extremelyinterested in a rather nondescript nobody handing out the leaflets to passers by….. http://www.ebooksread.com/authors-eng/united-states-dept-of-state/foreign-service-list-volume-1952-tin/page-42-foreign-service-list-volume-1952-tin.shtmlUnited States. F22.4 and F22.5 state that requirement specifically. I would guess if those terms would disappear, I will do better. Oops, yes he did. He testified in 1964 that the only wound he saw was the large head wound. Do you think you couldn’t see the entry wound because of the damage on his head? What is it in this discussion you think you are defending, and, is this the sort of country you want to live in, want your heirs to live in…. I used it only as an aide-memoire to do what I was doing and then destroyed it. I didn’t want anything to remain that some squirrel would grab on and make whatever use that they might. As a layman you assume that it is necessary to do that to establish a missile’s path; in reality it is rarely necessary to do so. Grand juries consist of lay persons Photon. Since the Hardaway thread is now on this site, I figured you would go into hiding! But to do that, you have to admit that Humes was not “read in” on any conspiratorial plot at the time of the autopsy. The Agency unilaterally deprived the commission of a chance to obtain the full truth, which will now never be known.”. It does not even mention CT, ultrasound or MRI. It is an utterly extraordinary thing: a 700-page analysis, in microscopic detail, of the events of November 20-25, half a century ago this year, based on a thousand interviews, including with Jacqueline Kennedy, Robert Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson, and Lee Harvey Oswald's mother and brother. He was also interviewed by William Matson Law for his book, In the Eye of History: Disclosures in the JFK Assassination Medical Evidence (2005). IIRC, they never said “don’t do this, don’t do that.” But they clearly conveyed that they were impatient. http://jfk.education/node/Dr. Parkland enlisted the help of the medical illustrators at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center to paint the cast. Mai 2017 feierten wir den 100. Identifying this man could mean to locate the audio of the Perry audio. He says he worked that day using his training and instinct, trying to save his patient. Specter didn’t proceed further. Could you describe what you said in detail or tell us if you ever looked behind his head to confirm a wound in the back of his head? He destroyed some of them, including notes he took himself on the night of the autopsy, and perhaps also those of his consultant, Finck. Regardless, he also confirms it is an “exact copy” of the one he made for Tink. The part you quoted shows “the family” determining what could be done. 5, 1981Rita Regina Merthan, 50, the personal secretary to first lady Rosalynn Carter from 1977 to 1981…. more. He won’t admit he believes the autopsy photos and x-rays are faked. A woman in Toledo identified herself as 'The Underground'; she asserted that she had occult powers which would keep Kennedy alive. This means it can only be by conjecture to conclude the back wound and throat wound were connected. In the video posted by Mr Herrera, you say you will provide the sources for the debunking of the Neutron Activation analysis.Can you post those sources here please? But you do seem to assume that.
Carmilla Fanfiction Vampire Laura, Warkworth Shops, Amber Alert Uk Weather, Through With Love Destiny's Child, Death In Kentucky, Mom Full Form In It Industry, Red Cross Internship High School, Pacific Island Societies, Arere Ekkada Ekkada Song, Meaning Of Angelica Name,