The house of parliament represents and symbolizes the rule of a corruot governing system and the oppression of the people. V takes on many of the same destructive qualities of this totalitarian government. Comment. As Jory said, new political officers would be elected -- so anarchy would probably not rule. I think this is the reason why V calls himself an idea not a man. By an idea, it has infinite potential and is not regulated in any way; it is not bound by nothing but influential. This film brings up the question of how to overcome oppression and tyranny. But what comes of this? Very simply: What is a film thinking about, how is it thinking about that, and what may be the value of that thinking? To the contrary to your other claim, I would have to disagree with you about the government not being destroyed with British Parliament. The generals and soldiers (government, regulation, and authority) did not know what to do without the Chancellors commands, and neglected to act towards the freed public. I can't see a successful future in store for them. Both the V For Vendetta graphic novel and movie draw on the Gunpowder Plot from 1605, where a group of English Catholics conspired to blow up the Houses of Parliament. Even if the destroying of a building is enough to inspire the entire the entire British population to rise up and overthrow the government, I dont believe that whatever government replaces the old one will be much better. (Click the red X - upper right corner - to make this notice vanish forever). After the building is destroyed, the government is most likely to crack down even further on the British people to destroy any hopes for a revolt. "Film Development" is what we at filmtank.org are calling the process of thinking about films with the idea that the films themselves are thinking. I actually really like the analysis of the way parliament exploded and the way the government in place is going to fall apart. V kidnapping and torturing Evey, and then destroying a building to point out the governments faults is like a father spanking his son for hitting his sister; its counterproductive. This page was generated at 09:10 PM. I like your idea of Vs death being necessary for his ideals of human liberation from the government. Remember, remember, the Fifth of November, the Gunpowder Treason and Plot. They realize that when they killed the captain he was just like Dr. Moreau, and thus the evil doctor could die as well. All times are GMT-8. Post Cancel. But what of the man? The British government in the film acts violently against the British people to keep them in line and to stop them from questioning the actions of the government, and to react to this violence with more violence just doesnt make sense. The government has no been destroyed. By remaining anonymous, V was able to keep the idea exactly what it is: and idea. This is because of the way the bomb will not actually destroy the government in power, instead it will undermine their basis of power. The film does glorify Evey and V's dramatic destruction of the House of Parliament but I also detected a trace of doubt in the story's ending. Freedom to exercise our freedom was the new law. He is identified with the Guy Fawkes mask throughout the whole movie. With this attack getting through the promise of the regime will be broken, but more importantly it will show that they can bleed and they can be defeated. Copycat revolutionaries will use his mask to carry out destruction and this cycle of violence will perpetuate. After the release and relative success of Road House, writer Hilary Henkinwas brought on to flesh out the project with an initial draft – one that bears little, if any, relation to the finished product, with the inclusion of overtly satirical and surrealistic elements not present in the graphic novel, as well as the removal of much of th… I feel that this really interacts well with your first point, as you kind of discussed. However, I feel like his violent actions will just beget more violence. Because V is the embodiment of the idea for change, the question arises as to whether he has a self. The overarching theme of this movie is the empowerment of the people. He tortures Evey brutally. Although I see what youre saying, that V and Eveys destroying of the parliament was a symbol, and by destroying the building, theyre destroying fear, but I think that idea is misguided. In 1988, producer Joel Silver acquired the rights to two of Alan Moore's works: V for Vendetta and Watchmen. V was the embodiment of the corruption of the government, and he himself knew of the vast amounts of corruption within the government which had been covered up for years. I believe V could have done more by staying alive and continuing a discussion. If this is your first visit, be sure to I am going to respectably disagree with the majority of the posts on this thread. In relationship to your post, the idea of freedom was now the new government. Then what would be the fate of England? This is stated by V who is explaining to to evey why he is blowing up the house of parliament. V personally survived the cruel and unusual experiments of the government in their attempts to control the population through fear and make personal gains; it was exactly this experience which made V impervious to the fear of death and gave him the strength to create a revolution. This is similar to Island of Lost Souls when the beast men kill the captain of the ship. This leads to my next thought. But what is to come after this? There is one quote in particular that sums up the efforts of V in the movie, People should not be afraid of their governments, the governments should be afraid of their people. I strongly believe with the British Parliament blowing up, the government crumbled as well. For, much of the power of Sutler's regime comes from how they promise to protect everyone from terrorist attacks. This was a plot to assassinate the Protestant King James with barrels of gunpowder placed under the building in the hopes of installing a new ruler more sympathetic to their beliefs. He gleefully destroys buildings and carries out countless murders. The film was made by many of the same filmmakers involved in The Matrix series. V was the symbol of liberation, through anarchism, from regulation; and without his death, people would have only idolized and worshiped him as a ruler, virtually the same way of as Chancellor Sutler; ultimately, leading to, again, a regulated state with limited freedom brought about by fear. Yes, from what I remember from the film, the Parliament was a symbol of governmental supremacy, stated by V; but also, the entire population in the community walked through and past the soldiers and tanks to celebrate the 5th of November. The image of parliament blowing up is a direct call to action for all the citizens of the UK, letting them know that they need to step up if they want to be free of the government's fear-based control. Thus, we need social structure and governmental enforcement of law and legislation to keep order to protect the individual safe. This ideal law was not a physical material, but a simple understanding that we are now free., V for Vendetta (James McTeigue, 2006) Symbols. By doing so, it was the films way of concluding the annihilation of the government. I know his name was Guy Fawkes and I know, in 1605, he attempted to blow up the Houses of Parliament.. V manifested freedom through the un-limitedness of idea. I think that V was the catalyst that the people needed to rise above the tyranny of the government; more specifically V represents an idea. He would be able to carry on this conversation about the corruptness of the government. A major part of the reason why V wanted to keep his identity withheld is because a face behind the idea would negate the idea and make the cause all about the person. V for Vendetta (James Mcteigue, 2006)-Destroying Parliament. I feel a revolutionary like V would be more valuable to society alive. V even refuses to take off his mask once he has gained complete trust of Evey after keeping her imprisoned; as Evey tells him in one of the last moments before his death, that she loves him more than anybody else, but knows nothing about him. I don't feel that these actions have consequences that change much. Read more. Vs identity is withheld throughout the movie to not only the audience but also from Evey. For the most part, violent revolutions breed violent leaders. check out the. Though, as social contract states, all humans are at war with each other. The implosion of the building implies the way the basis of fear that keeps the government in power will supposedly crumble after this point.
211 First Call For Help, Sideways Trading Strategy, Cordele Police Reports, Raghava Lawrence Movies, Charrington Jack The Ripper, Billy Graham Early Sermons, Republican Party Ideology, Unemployment Login Benefits External, Supernatural Crowley Last Episode,